Postal Codes Dataset for Pakistan, PK

167
Updated:
Files:1
Size:158 kB
Formats:csv
License:CC-BY-4.0

Postal Codes Dataset for Pakistan, PK including name of the city, town, or place, various administrative divisions and alternative city names.

Part of a Data Solution

  • Postal Codes Solution

    Every worldwide postal-code dataset in one bundle — the ultimate global reference for precise postal codes.

    Explore →

Premium

You're viewing a free sample

Get the complete dataset — all rows and files — delivered instantly after checkout, with lifetime access to the latest version.

  • Secure checkout via Stripe
  • Instant download after payment
  • Lifetime access to the latest version
  • Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license
20% off
$49.90$39.92
one-time payment

API Access

Access dataset files directly from scripts, code, or AI agents.

Browse dataset files
Dataset Files

Each file has a stable URL (r-link) that you can use directly in scripts, apps, or AI agents. These URLs are permanent and safe to hardcode.

/logistics/postal-codes-pk/
https://datahub.io/logistics/postal-codes-pk/_r/-/.licensing-notes.md
https://datahub.io/logistics/postal-codes-pk/_r/-/README.md
https://datahub.io/logistics/postal-codes-pk/_r/-/datapackage.yml
Key Files

Start with these files — they give you everything you need to understand and access the dataset.

datapackage.ymlmetadata & schema
https://datahub.io/logistics/postal-codes-pk/_r/-/datapackage.yml
README.mddocumentation
https://datahub.io/logistics/postal-codes-pk/_r/-/README.md
Typical Usage
  1. 1. Fetch datapackage.yml to inspect schema and resources
  2. 2. Download data resources listed in datapackage.yml
  3. 3. Read README.md for full context

Data Files

Postal Codes Data Resource for Pakistan, PK

About

Last updated
3 September 2026
Total rows
...
Format
CSV
File size
158 kB

About this dataset

Pakistan (PK) — internal licensing notes

Source research, 2026-09-03 — tier-1 check done before defaulting to GeoNames

Per the project's own lesson (GeoNames is fallback, not default), checked Pakistan Post's official site first, not GeoNames. Found and downloaded the real official source: pakpost.gov.pk/images/national post code directory.pdf — the "National Post Code Directory," Part-I (Delivery Post Offices), 45 pages, 2,563 rows, columns: office name, post code, account office (parent GPO), province, attached branch office codes. Extracted cleanly via pdfplumber (genuine text-based tables, not scanned images).

Decisive cross-check: compared this official PDF extraction directly against GeoNames' PK export. Every single one of 2,563 (postal_code, place_name) pairs matches exactly, both directions, 0 discrepancies. GeoNames' PK data already reflects this exact official source — verified, not assumed — with WGS84 coordinates added on top. This means using GeoNames for PK is not a fallback-of-convenience here; it is confirmed to be the official source content, at zero extra build complexity from maintaining a separate PDF-parsing pipeline.

Verified directly against the raw source file:

  • admin_name1/admin_code1 — Province/territory, 7/7 covered (Punjab, Sindh, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Balochistan, Gilgit-Baltistan, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Federal Capital/Islamabad). GeoNames' own codes (02-08) are internal numbers, unrelated to ISO 3166-2:PK's real 2-letter codes (PK-BA, PK-PB, etc.) — verified against Wikipedia's ISO_3166-2:PK page 2026-09-03, name-based crosswalk required (same hazard class as JP/IN/CZ in this batch).
  • No admin2/admin3 tier exists in either the PDF or GeoNames — Pakistan Post's own directory stops at province + "account office" (a postal routing concept, the parent GPO a smaller office reports to, not a government administrative division). Disclosed as genuinely absent, not dropped.
  • 0 exact duplicates, 0 (postal_code, place_name) collisions, 0 literal "nan" strings.
  • The PDF's own province spellings have typos ("Punjba", "SIndh") — GeoNames' version is already correctly spelled, another sign it is a cleaned derivative of this same source rather than an independent gazetteer guess.

licence_status

{
  "channel": "postal-codes-r2",
  "source_url": "https://download.geonames.org/export/zip/PK.zip",
  "licence_id": "CC-BY-4.0",
  "collected_at": "2026-09-03",
  "decision": "compatible",
  "decided_by": "claude-session-2026-09-03",
  "decided_at": "2026-09-03"
}

Proposed tier

B ($49). Real cross-verification work against an official government PDF (not a trivial GeoNames pass-through), 7/7 province coverage, clean data. Same shape as JP/IN/CZ's ISO-crosswalk builds.

Build — 2026-09-03

Built via datasets/pk/scripts/build_postal_codes_product.py.

value
Final rows2,563
Provinces/territories covered7/7
Distinct postal codes2,560
(postal_code, place_name) collisions0

Frictionless validation: valid: True. Zero literal "nan" strings, zero float-formatted accuracy, zero duplicates.

Status: built and validated locally only. Nothing published to R2, nothing committed to git yet.