Contributing to Chess Multiverse Error Explorer
Thank you for your interest in contributing to the Chess Multiverse Error Explorer.
This project is part of the broader Chess Multiverse Lab initiative and aims to provide reproducible, open research infrastructure for studying human chess errors, decision-making, time-pressure effects, and behavioral analytics.
We welcome contributions from:
- Software developers
- Data scientists
- Chess researchers
- Open-science contributors
- UX/UI designers
- Documentation writers
- Students and independent researchers
Guiding Principles
Contributions should support one or more of the following goals:
- Reproducibility
- Transparency
- Analytical correctness
- Research usability
- Open science
- Long-term maintainability
The project prioritizes research quality over feature quantity.
Ways to Contribute
Bug Reports
If you discover a bug:
-
Search existing issues first.
-
Create a new issue if none exists.
-
Include:
- Browser version
- Operating system
- Steps to reproduce
- Expected behavior
- Actual behavior
- Screenshots if applicable
Feature Requests
Feature proposals should:
- Clearly describe the problem
- Explain the research value
- Provide a proposed implementation approach
- Consider reproducibility implications
Examples:
- New analytical metrics
- Additional export formats
- Dashboard enhancements
- Query optimization
- Accessibility improvements
Code Contributions
Workflow
- Fork the repository.
- Create a feature branch.
git checkout -b feature/my-improvement
- Commit changes using descriptive messages.
git commit -m "Add opening volatility metric"
- Push your branch.
git push origin feature/my-improvement
- Open a Pull Request.
Development Guidelines
JavaScript
Please follow existing coding conventions:
- Use descriptive variable names.
- Prefer explicit logic over clever shortcuts.
- Keep analytical calculations readable.
- Comment non-obvious mathematical operations.
- Avoid introducing unnecessary dependencies.
SQL
Generated SQL should:
- Remain reproducible.
- Avoid browser-blocking queries.
- Be compatible with DuckDB WASM.
- Prioritize analytical clarity.
User Interface
UI contributions should:
- Remain responsive.
- Support mobile devices.
- Preserve accessibility.
- Avoid unnecessary visual complexity.
Research Metrics
Several metrics implemented in the platform are research constructs.
Examples include:
- Expected Score Loss (ESL)
- Opening Danger Index (ODI)
- Panic Index
Changes affecting these metrics should:
- Include methodological justification.
- Include validation examples.
- Update documentation.
- Preserve reproducibility.
Testing Requirements
All contributions should pass the automated verification framework.
Current validation coverage includes:
- Parquet ingestion
- DuckDB projections
- SQL filter generation
- Expected Score Loss calculations
- Opening Danger Index calculations
- Panic Index calculations
- Material-signature search
- State serialization
- Export systems
- Dashboard synchronization
- Position replay validation
- Performance benchmarks
Where applicable, new features should include additional tests.
Documentation Contributions
Documentation improvements are highly encouraged.
Examples:
- Correcting inaccuracies
- Improving tutorials
- Expanding methodology explanations
- Enhancing installation instructions
- Adding reproducibility examples
Dataset Contributions
The Chess Multiverse Error Explorer depends on the Chess Multiverse Error & Evaluation Dataset (CMEED).
If contributing dataset improvements:
- Preserve schema compatibility whenever possible.
- Document structural changes.
- Maintain reproducibility.
- Provide migration notes when necessary.
Pull Request Checklist
Before submitting a pull request:
- Code compiles successfully
- Existing tests pass
- Documentation is updated
- New functionality is explained
- No unnecessary dependencies added
- Reproducibility is preserved
Citation
If your contribution results in a publication, please cite:
Chess Multiverse Error Explorer
and
Chess Multiverse Error & Evaluation Dataset (CMEED v1.0)
as described in the project README.
Questions
For questions, discussions, or research collaboration ideas, please open a GitHub Issue.
Constructive feedback, reproducible research practices, and open collaboration are always welcome.
Thank you for helping improve open chess research infrastructure.